If using a source with a history of dishonesty is unavoidable, what are some ways that journalists can be transparent with readers/viewers about the source’s history? Is it always necessary to make a disclaimer?
If using a source with a history of dishonesty is unavoidable, what are some ways that journalists can be transparent with readers/viewers about the source’s history? Is it always necessary to make a disclaimer?
Topic: Police Sources - Accuracy
Theme: Sourcing